Skull Fossil Suggests Simpler Human Lineage
Georgian National Museum
After eight years spent studying a 1.8-million-year-old skull uncovered
in the Republic of Georgia, scientists have made a discovery that may
rewrite the evolutionary history of our human genus Homo.
J.H. Matternes
The New York Times
Courtesy of Guram Bumbiashvili, Georgian National Museum
Fernando Javier Urquijo
It would be a simpler story with fewer ancestral species. Early, diverse
fossils — those currently recognized as coming from distinct species
like Homo habilis, Homo erectus and others — may actually represent
variation among members of a single, evolving lineage.
In other words, just as people look different from one another today, so
did early hominids look different from one another, and the
dissimilarity of the bones they left behind may have fooled scientists
into thinking they came from different species.
This was the conclusion reached by an international team of scientists
led by David Lordkipanidze, a paleoanthropologist at the Georgian
National Museum in Tbilisi, as reported Thursday in the journal Science.
The key to this revelation was a cranium excavated in 2005 and known
simply as Skull 5, which scientists described as “the world’s first
completely preserved adult hominid skull” of such antiquity. Unlike
other Homo fossils, it had a number of primitive features: a long,
apelike face, large teeth and a tiny braincase, about one-third the size
of that of a modern human being. This confirmed that, contrary to some
conjecture, early hominids did not need big brains to make their way out
of Africa.
The discovery of Skull 5 alongside the remains of four other hominids at
Dmanisi, a site in Georgia rich in material of the earliest hominid
travels into Eurasia, gave the scientists an opportunity to compare and
contrast the physical traits of ancestors that apparently lived at the
same location and around the same time.
Dr. Lordkipanidze and his colleagues said the differences between these
fossils were no more pronounced than those between any given five modern
humans or five chimpanzees. The hominids who left the fossils, they
noted, were quite different from one another but still members of one
species.
“Had the braincase and the face of Skull 5 been found as separate
fossils at different sites in Africa, they might have been attributed to
different species,” a co-author of the journal report, Christoph
Zollikofer of the University of Zurich, said in a statement. Such was
often the practice of researchers, using variations in traits to define
new species.
Although the Dmanisi finds look quite different from one another, Dr.
Zollikofer said, the hominids who left them were living at the same time
and place, and “so could, in principle, represent a single population
of a single species.” He and his Zurich colleague, Marcia Ponce de León,
conducted the comparative analysis of the Dmanisi specimens.
“Since we see a similar pattern and range of variation in the African
fossil record,” Dr. Zollikofer continued, “it is sensible to assume that
there was a single Homo species at that time in Africa.” Moreover, he
added, “since the Dmanisi hominids are so similar to the African ones,
we further assume that they both represent the same species.”
But what species? Some team members simply call their finds “early
Homo.” Others emphasized the strong similarities to Homo erectus, which
lived between two million and less than one million years ago. Tim D.
White, a paleoanthropologist at the University of California, Berkeley,
called it “the most primitive H. erectus yet known,” noting that “it is
more similar than any other yet found to early Homo from eastern
Africa,” a group of hominids estimated to have lived 2.3 million years
ago.
All five of the skulls and skeletal bones were found in underground
dens, suggesting grisly scenes from the perilous lives these early Homos
led. They resided among carnivores, including saber-toothed cats and an
extinct giant cheetah. All five of the individuals had probably been
attacked and killed by the carnivores, their carcasses dragged into the
dens for the after-hunt feast, with nothing left but dinner scraps for
curious fossil hunters.
Dr. White and other scientists not involved in the research hailed the
importance of the skull discovery and its implications for understanding
early Homo evolution. In an article analyzing the report, Science
quoted Ian Tattersall of the American Museum of Natural History in New
York as saying that the skull “is undoubtedly one of the most important
ever discovered.”
A few scientists quibbled that the skull looks more like Homo habilis or
questioned the idea that fossils in Africa all belong to Homo erectus,
but there was broad recognition that the new findings were a watershed
in the study of evolution. “As the most complete early Homo skull ever
found,” Dr. White wrote in an e-mail, “it will become iconic for
Dmanisi, for earliest Homo erectus and more broadly for how we became
human.”
Dr. White, who has excavated hominid fossils in Ethiopia for years, said
he was impressed with “the total evidentiary package from the site that
is the really good news story here.” Further, he said, he hoped the
discovery would “now focus the debate on evolutionary biology beyond the
boring ‘lumpers vs. splitters' ” — a reference to the tendencies of
fossil hunters to either lump new finds into existing species or split
them off into new species.
In their report, the Dmanisi researchers said the Skull 5 individual
“provides the first evidence that early Homo comprised adult individuals
with small brains but body mass, stature and limb proportions reaching
the lower range limit of modern variation.”
Skeletal bones associated with the five Dmanisi skulls show that these
hominids were short in stature, but that their limbs enabled them to
walk long distances as fully upright bipeds. The shape of the small
braincase distinguished them from the more primitive Australopithecus
genus, which preceded Homo and lived for many centuries with Homo in
Africa.
No hay comentarios:
Publicar un comentario